Spend less
Claude or Codex plans the work and checks it. A cheaper model does the typing. Five kinds of worker to choose from, some free.
Stuntman
You pay for the smartest AI, then watch it burn your limit on typing. Stuntman keeps it thinking and checking, and sends a cheaper model in to do the stunts.
You pay for the smartest model. Then you watch it burn your limit on boilerplate.
Claude or Codex plans the work and checks it. A cheaper model does the typing. Five kinds of worker to choose from, some free.
Hit your usage cap and the job moves to another worker. It picks up where it stopped.
Every project keeps its own memory, so tomorrow’s session starts where today’s ended.
One knowledge graph across all your projects, so an agent finds what you already solved.
A live pixel board of every agent you have running: who’s working, who’s stuck, who needs you. Reply from the board.
Competitors, market size, pricing and a week-by-week plan, then attacked by critics before you see it.
One head-to-head: build the same landing page. The expensive model alone, against Stuntman. Measured from the tools’ own usage reports.
| Expensive model alone | Stuntman | |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | $4.92 | $0.65 |
| Time | 18 min, never finished | About 3 min |
| Review | Marked its own homework | Passed first time |
| Result | The slightly nicer page | About 90% of it |

It reads your code and writes a brief with no decisions left open.
A cheaper model follows the brief, fast and without supervision.
It runs the tests itself and sends fixes back. It trusts nothing.
Try it, then tell me what you’d change.